Sunday, October 19, 2014

Facebook: Social information processing theory

Facebook: Social Information Processing Theory

University of Wisconsin Milwaukee - VY Cannis Majoris

Kevin Hurst, Troy Shaw, Jared Bachman, Erin Van Derven

Introduction

Facebook has over 1 billion visitors per month, and is the 2nd most visited website on earth. (Desilver, 2013)  The social networking site has achieved massive popularity, not only being the 2nd most visited website, but also expanding its sphere of influence into all aspects of daily life for not just most Americans but for the entire world.
Looking at how Facebook builds relationships, and also how it relates to the theory of social information processing, it is important to first:
·         Look into some of the media characteristics of Facebook.
·         Relate it to Social information processing theory, and-
·         Find out more information through the use of interviews.
These three aspects will help to explain why Facebook and its relationship building aspects are important to look at, and will help to show the connection between Facebook the theory of social information processing. Considering the fact of Facebook’s widespread usage for a variety of reasons, it is essential to understand Facebook’s role in computer mediated communication.

The Technology of Facebook

Looking at the media characteristics of Facebook requires looking at the different ways that users communicate on the website.  Firstly, it is important to look at how people use the functionality of their instant-messaging system and private messages.  Additionally, Facebook provides an avenue for self-disclosure using its different systems of posting to their “wall” or “timeline”. The Facebook timeline allows for people to provide information and communicate with not just one person, but groups of people or even all users who can access Facebook.
Significantly more than its predecessor MySpace, Facebook has become its own verb.  This is the one computer meditated communication that has transcended into a completely new world of possibilities, and it has as a result become the birthplace of many imitations.  Instagram, Snapchat, and even Foursquare can be said to have been fostered from Facebook.
While some users will solely post updates over using the private messaging and vice versa, we can assume that those users are not in the majority.  Some of the characteristics that are unique to Facebook compared to other forms of social media include a more personal experience, instant self-disclosure, and status and cue updates.
The first characteristic that Facebook displays is a uniquely personal experience for users. Users update a social profile complete with personal information, pictures, and updates on what they are doing at that moment. Because it uses printed text, without even the texture of paper to lend it individuality, electronic communication tends to seem impersonal.
“Communicators must imagine their audience, for at a terminal it almost seems as though the computer itself is the audience.” (Kiesler, Siegel, & McGuire, 1984)  Facebook seeks to overcome this with its layout and functions, such as the fact that users posting a status update will receive feedback from a variety of people in the form of likes and comments.  This allows for users to look at who is viewing their posts.  Additionally, users who reply are also able to look at the poster’s profile in order to lift the veil from over their eyes and attempt to provide a more personal electronic communication. 

Social information processing theory

Looking at Social information processing theory and its relationship to Facebook first requires an understanding of the theory.  Social information processing theory seeks to explain relationship building over computer mediated communication, and additionally explains how people share information with each other without the luxury of nonverbal communication.  Fulk writes that, “The basic promise of Social information processing theory is that meaning is socially constructed.  Although objective characteristics and constraints in the work environment do influence perceptions and behavior information provided by the social environment is of at least equal importance.” (Fulk, Steinfield, Schmitz, & Power, 1987) 
Facebook lets users provide their own information about their social environment, and that is one of the reasons why Social information processing theory relates so well to Facebook.  The idea behind the theory is simply put that people using computer mediated communication can create relationships that are the same to relationships that are formed using face to face communication, however the length of time required for computer mediated relationships is greater than that of face to face relationships. Walther describes the theory as this:  “This theory asserts that communicators using any medium experience the similar needs for uncertainty reduction and affinity, and to meet these needs CMC users will adapt their linguistic and textual behaviors to the solicitation and presentation of socially revealing, relational behavior.” (Walther & Anderson, 1994)
Walther uses this theory to show that no matter the medium, people will always want to reduce uncertainty and build relationships.  Facebook, as will be shown, strives to ease both of those processes.  Therefore, as it stands, Social information processing theory is a very broad theory that describes the interpersonal relationship building process as it relates to computer mediated communication.
            Upon learning about Facebook and some of its media characteristics, the next step would be to look into how Facebook relates to the Social information processing theory.  Facebook lessens the time required to make relationships as genuine as face to face relationships in a variety of ways.  Users on Facebook can disclose information about themselves as much or as little as they would like.  This allows for a user to disclose a lot of personal information such as likes or dislikes, hobbies, and other interests they have, and also for anyone who is communicating with them to have access to that information.  This allows for people to both learn more about someone they already know, and in the case of a stranger looking at a person’s page for the first time it will allow for them to reduce uncertainty by looking at the interests and photos of that other person.  As a result we can say that Facebook allows for users to lessen the time required to form relationships by making information easy to access, allowing users to disclose their information on their own time, and to take enough time to craft a clear message.
            Facebook also implements the more traditional form of CMC of instant messaging and private messaging.  These functions go hand in hand with the profile portion of the website, thus allowing for users to see information such as relationship statuses and common friends, before or after sending a message.  One of the downsides of an instant messaging application is, as Kielser writes, that “Availability of instantaneous electronic communication, for example, might lead people to expect immediate responses.” (Kiesler, Siegel, & McGuire, 1984)  That can be the cause for some tension in the relationship.  A similar phenomenon happens with the use of text messaging. However, this application allows for a more timely messaging system and can create an environment that will allow for an easier and faster avenue of communication.
                 The absence of cues is something that hinders the development of computer mediated communication, however Facebook employs a variety of methods to address this.  One of the most widely thought of methods are emoticons, which portray a facial expression.  Today, emoticons are programmed to provide a small graphic in the instant messaging application of Facebook.  These simple images allow for senders to convey a simple facial expression, which paired with photos of themselves can allow for the receiver to form a reasonable image of the sender and to enhance some sort of cues. Additionally, the use of language acronyms, an example being “LOL” for laughing out loud, can also portray cues in the conversation in some form.  While these cues are not as pronounced as face to face communications, they do serve some purpose in creating meaningful communication.
“Caution, however, must be exercised with paralinguistic cues in CMC, for they have localized meanings” (Olaniran, Rodriguez, & Williams)  What Olaniran means by this is that cues such as emoticons and acronyms do not have the same meaning to every person who uses CMC, specifically Facebook.  So while the use of those types of cues can be helpful, they can also be harmful and can distort the message.
        The use of nontraditional cues such as emoticons, the use of profiles to reduce uncertainty, and the ability to transfer messages instantaneously all link Facebook with Social information processing theory.  As evidenced, Facebook has employed numerous methods relating to the theory in an effort to make easier the building of relationships using computer mediated communication.

Interview Results

Through interviews conducted with three individuals, it became apparent that users placed significant effort into creating an online persona, as Social information processing theory would suggest.  The specific audience of an interviewee’s message was less important than was the effect of maintaining their online persona.
Three people were interviewed:
·         Nancy, a 58 year old mother. (Julich, 2014)
·         Nick, a 26 year old young professional. (Simmons, 2014)
·         Jessica, a 17 year old high school student. (Parnell, 2014)
As expected, their answers for general use information questions varied widely.  Though not particularly noteworthy, I felt this showed the range of backgrounds, making shared answers more significant.  
Interviewees chose Facebook because of its rich sharing capabilities.  They enjoyed the ability to share photos, thoughts, feelings, and information, and the fact that they could control the audience of this information.  All of this combined helps to maintain the image and persona of the online user.  While it can take longer to form a relationship online, the ability to frame the conversation and to better control the back and forth flow of information can help to reduce conflict and grow relationships more deeply.
Younger users appeared to show more concern with their online persona, especially as it related to business contacts.  Nancy, at age 58, has established herself professionally and was complete unconcerned with what business contacts might see.  Nick and Jessica, on the other hand, were concerned with what business contacts might see to the point where they indicated they would discontinue using Facebook if business contacts had access to their posts.
What was interesting was that, despite their friend group or motivation to be on Facebook, all three had a clear idea of how they wanted to present themselves online. It became clear that the motivation behind using different modes of communication on Facebook – private messages, sharing stories, status updates, and wall posts – shared the intent to uphold their online persona.  It also became clear that the way the user interacted with any individual wasn’t based on the other user, but based on the user’s “Facebook audience” as a whole.

Conclusions

            Social information processing theory suggests that while online relationships can take more time to develop than a traditional face-to-face relationship, once established they can demonstrate the same qualities. (Walther & Anderson, 1994)
            As evidenced, Facebook has evolved to become perhaps the largest host of mediated communication in the United States, with global reach as well.  Research has shown that through use of the wall, timeline, private messages, emoticons and other multimedia, members can use Facebook to grow, maintain, and build relationships.
            Through use of the sharing functionality on Facebook, users can create a persona largely of their choosing.  By choosing what pictures, posts, and communications are posted online, they can shape the view of themselves that others will see.  While these relationships may as a result be ‘different’ than what might have formed traditionally face-to-face, there is no doubt that they can share an equal level of richness and quality.  If not for this fact, it’s doubtful that billions of people would continue visiting Facebook every month.

Bibliography

Desilver, D. (2013, October 4). Chart of the Week: The world’s most popular web sites. Retrieved from Pew Research Center: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/10/04/chart-of-the-week-the-worlds-most-popular-web-sites/
Fulk, J., Steinfield, C., Schmitz, J., & Power, J. (1987). A social information processing model of media use in organizations. Communication Research, 14(5), 529-552.
Julich, N. (2014, October). Interview on Facebook Use. (E. Van Derven, Interviewer)
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), 1123.
Olaniran, B., Rodriguez, N., & Williams, I. (n.d.). Social Information Processing Theory (SIPT): A Cultural Perspective for International Online Communication Environments.
Parnell, J. (2014, October). Interview on Facebook Use. (E. Van Derven, Interviewer)
Simmons, N. (2014, October). Interview on Facebook Use. (E. Van Derven, Interviewer)
Walther, J., & Anderson, J. (1994). Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction. Communication Research, 21(4), 448-60.

 

Appendix A- Interview Schedule

       I.            Opening
A.    (Establish Rapport) [shake hands] My name is Erin, and I am doing some research on technology and relationships for my communications course.
B.     (Purpose) I would like to ask you some questions about your experience using Facebook to establish and maintain relationships both socially and professionally.
C.     (Motivation) I hope to use this information to better understand how different people utilize Facebook 
D.    (Time Line) The interview should take about 10 minutes. Are you available to respond to some questions at this time?
(Transition: Let me begin by asking you some questions on how you get interested in Facebook)
    II.            Body
A.    (Topic) General Use Information
1.How long have you used Facebook?
(Question 1. Interviewees were selected based on the fact that they use Facebook)
a.       What was your motivation to sign up?
2.How often do you log in?
a.       How much time do you spend logged in on average?
b.      What do you like to do on Facebook?
(Transition to the next topic: Many people have been using Facebook to keep in touch or get back in touch with old friends…)
B.     (Topic) Relationship building/maintaining
1. Is your contact group on Facebook mainly friends, family or business contacts?
a.       Is this different than when you originally signed up. If so, why?
2. How do you interact with others on Facebook (wall posts, private messages, comments)?
a.       Does your message or tone change depending on the medium?
3. Do you have any business contacts as friends on Facebook? (Note answer for topic C)
4. How do you use Facebook to maintain to influence relationships?
 (Transition to the next topic: (react to last answer) I think it’s fair to say that online relationships allow the user a lot of power in how they are perceived…)
C.     (Topic) Online Persona
1. How do you think others perceive you based solely on your profile?
a.       Do you make a conscious effort to appear a certain way?
2. What influences your “online persona?”
a.       When interacting on Facebook, which has a greater influence to you, the task you are trying to achieve, or who you are interacting with?
b.      Can you elaborate on that?
3. Lastly, (choose a or b)
a.       (If the interviewee has business contacts as friends) how do you think your persona is affected by having business associates as friends on Facebook?
b.      (If the interviewee does not have business contacts as friends) How would you change your approach to Facebook if you knew that business associates were looking at your profile?
 (Transition: Well, it has been a pleasure speaking with you today. To make sure I recorded your answers properly, let me briefly summarize the information that I have recorded during our interview.)
 III.            Closing
A.    (Summarize) The way you use Facebook is mainly by ________ and your friends group largely consists of _________.   You consider your online persona to be ________ and this is influenced by _________.
B.     (Maintain Rapport) I appreciate the time you took for this interview. Is there anything else you think would be helpful for me to know?
C.     (Action to be taken) I should have all the information I need. Would it be alright to call you at home if I have any more questions? Thanks again!



Appendix B- Interview Notes

Interview with Nancy Julich

       I.            Body
A.    (Topic) General Use Information
1.How long have you used Facebook?
5 Years
a.       What was your motivation to sign up?
To keep in touch with family, and my sons.
2.How often do you log in?
Every few days.
a.       How much time do you spend logged in on average?
About 30 minutes.
b.      What do you like to do on Facebook?
Look at pictures and posts. I send messages with my siblings.
B.      (Topic) Relationship building/maintaining
1. Is your contact group on Facebook mainly friends, family or business contacts?
Family.
a.       Is this different than when you originally signed up. If so, why?
No.
2. How do you interact with others on Facebook?
I mostly comment on other posts or send private messages
a.       Does your message or tone change depending on the medium?
Private messages are more personal than other more public content.
3. Do you have any business contacts as friends on Facebook?
Yes
4. How do you use Facebook to maintain to influence relationships?
I like to look at pictures and send messages. Sometimes will use what’s seen on Facebook in phone conversations.
C.      (Topic) Online Persona
1. How do you think others perceive you based solely on your profile?
They probably think I don’t know what I’m doing!
a.       Do you make a conscious effort to appear a certain way?
Not too much.
2. What influences your “online persona?”
I honestly don’t think about it.
a.       When interacting on Facebook, which has a greater influence to you, the task you are trying to achieve, or who you are interacting with?
Who I’m interacting with.
b.      Can you elaborate on that?
Well, if I know someone really well I might be more casual but otherwise I just kind of say what I want.
3. How do you think your persona is affected by having business associates as friends on Facebook?
Not too affected. At this age, there’s not too much coworkers can’t know about me.

Interview with Nick Simmons

       I.            Body
A.    (Topic) General Use Information
1. How long have you used Facebook?
Since 2007, 7 years.
a.       What was your motivation to sign up?
My older brother introduced it to me, some of my friends in high school started using it.
2. How often do you log in?
Daily until I finished college, now only about twice per week.
a.       How much time do you spend logged in on average?
No longer than 30 minutes.
b.      What do you like to do on Facebook?
Look at what my distant friends are up to, and check in on family.
B.      (Topic) Relationship building/maintaining
1. Is your contact group on Facebook mainly friends, family or business contacts?
Friends, but mainly family.
a.       Is this different than when you originally signed up. If so, why?
When I originally signed up, only friends were on Facebook.  Now my family is the bigger user group of Facebook.
2. How do you interact with others on Facebook?
I generally only comment on other people’s posts.
a.       Does your message or tone change depending on the medium?
It changes more based on the person I’m contacting.
3. Do you have any business contacts as friends on Facebook?
I have no business contacts on Facebook, only on LinkedIn.
4. How do you use Facebook to maintain to influence relationships?
I usually comment on my old friend’s walls or pictures to keep a line of communication going.
C.      (Topic) Online Persona
1. How do you think others perceive you based solely on your profile?
I haven’t thought of that really, probably, “He doesn’t care about Facebook.”
a.       Do you make a conscious effort to appear a certain way?
I try to appear funny instead of political or sad when I post.
2. What influences your “online persona?”
My family, friends or wife, things they think are funny.
a.       When interacting on Facebook, which has a greater influence to you, the task you are trying to achieve, or who you are interacting with?
The people I am interacting with.
b.      Can you elaborate on that?
I’m not trying to achieve anything on Facebook, so I just like have a conversation with my friends or family with my posts/comments.
3. How would you change your approach to Facebook if you knew that business associates were looking at your profile?
I would probably stop using Facebook altogether.  I think business interactions are much more effective in person.

Interview with Jessica Parnell

       I.            Body
A.    (Topic) General Use Information
1. How long have you used Facebook?
5 years.
a.       What was your motivation to sign up?
Friends had accounts.
2. How often do you log in?
Daily.
a.       How much time do you spend logged in on average?
30 minutes.
b.      What do you like to do on Facebook?
Look at other peoples’ pictures, and watch videos.
B.      (Topic) Relationship building/maintaining
1. Is your contact group on Facebook mainly friends, family or business contacts?
Friends.
a.       Is this different than when you originally signed up. If so, why?
No.
2. How do you interact with others on Facebook?
Comments and ‘Likes’.
a.       Does your message or tone change depending on the medium?
No.
3. Do you have any business contacts as friends on Facebook?
No.
4. How do you use Facebook to maintain to influence relationships?
Posts on walls and statuses, mainly with cousins.
C.      (Topic) Online Persona
1. How do you think others perceive you based solely on your profile?
Fun and active.
a.       Do you make a conscious effort to appear a certain way?
I like people to think I’m always having fun.
2. What influences your “online persona?”
Knowing that everyone at school can see it.
a.       When interacting on Facebook, which has a greater influence to you, the task you are trying to achieve, or who you are interacting with?
The people I am interacting with.
b.      Can you elaborate on that?
If it’s a close friend I might comment but if I don’t know them as well, maybe just a like
3. How would you change your approach to Facebook if you knew that business associates were looking at your profile?
I would probably get off Facebook. I don’t use it that much and it just seems too stressful to keep up appearance for work.


Notes from the interview

I interviewed three people – Nancy, a 58 year old mother, Nick, a 26 year old young professional, and Jessica, a 17 year old high school student. As I expected, their answers for general use information questions varied widely. Though not particularly noteworthy, I felt this showed the range of backgrounds making shared answers more noteworthy. What I found interesting was that, despite their friend group or motivation to be on Facebook, all three had a clear idea of how they wanted to present themselves online. It became clear that the motivation behind different modes of communication on Facebook – private messages, sharing stories, status updates, wall posts – was the intent to uphold their online persona. It also became clear that the way the user interacted with any individual wasn’t based on the other user, but based on the users “facebook audience” as a whole. 

Saturday, October 18, 2014

Introduction draft



 Introduction
What has over 1 billion visitors a month and is the 2nd most visited website on earth, Facebook, the social networking site has achieved massive popularity, not only being the 2nd most visited website, but also expanding its sphere of influence into all aspects of daily life for not just most Americans, but for the entire world. Looking at how Facebook builds relationships and also how it relates to the theory of social information processing it is important to first look into some of the media characteristics of Facebook, to relate it to social information processing theory, and find out more information through the use of interviews. These three aspects will help to explain why Facebook and its relationship building aspects are important to look at, and will help to show the connection between Facebook and social information processing theory. Considering the facts of Facebooks widespread usage for a variety of reasons it is essential to understand Facebooks role in computer mediated communication.

Part 3



         Looking at Social information processing theory and its relationship to Facebook first requires an understanding of the theory. Social information processing theory seeks to explain relationship building over computer mediated communication, additionally explains how people share information with each other without the luxury of nonverbal communication. Fulk writes that, “The basic promise of social information processing theory is that meaning is socially constructed. Although objective characteristics and constraints in the work environment do influence perceptions and behavior information provided by the social environment is of at least equal importance.” (Fulk, Steinfield, Schmitz & Power 531) Facebook lets users provide their own information about their social environment and that is one of the reasons why social information processing theory relates so well to Facebook. The idea behind the theory is simply put that people using computer mediated communication can create relationships that are the same to relationships that are formed using face to face communication, however the length of time required for computer mediated relationships is greater than that of face to face relationships. Walther describes the theory as this, “This theory asserts that communicators using any medium experience the similar needs for uncertainty reduction and affinity, and to meet these needs CMC users will adapt their linguistic and textual behaviors to the solicitation and presentation of socially revealing, relational behavior.” (Walther, Anderson & Park 465)  Walther uses this theory to show that no matter the medium people will always want to reduce uncertainty and build relationships, and Facebook as will be shown, strives to ease both of those processes. So as it stands social information processing theory is a very broad theory that describes the interpersonal relationship building process as it relates to computer mediated communication.

            Upon learning about Facebook and some of its media characteristics the next step would be to look into how Facebook relates to the social information processing theory. Facebook lessens the time required to make relationships as genuine as face to face relationships in a variety of ways. Users on Facebook can disclose information about themselves as much or as little as they would like this allows for a user to disclose a lot of personal information such as likes or dislikes, hobbies, and other interests they have and also for anyone who is communicating with them to have access to that information. This allows for people to both learn more about someone they already know, and in the case of a stranger looking at a person’s page for the first time it will allow for them to reduce uncertainty by looking at the interests and photos of that other person. So we can say that Facebook allows for users to lessen the time required to form relationships by making information easy to access and allowing users to disclose their information on their own time and to take enough time to craft a clear message.

            Facebook also implements the more traditional form of CMC of instant messaging and private messaging, however these functions go hand in hand with the profile portion of the website, thus allowing for users to see information such as relationship status’s and common friends, before or after sending a message. One of the downsides of an instant messaging application is this as Kielser writes, “Availability of instantaneous electronic communication, for example, might lead people to expect immediate responses. (Kiesler, Siegel, McGuire 1125) and that can be the cause for some tension in the relationship, a similar phenomenon happens with the use of text messaging. However this application allows for a more timely messaging system and can create an environment that will allow for an easier and faster avenue of communication.

                 The absence of cues is something that hinders the development of computer mediated communication, however Facebook curtails this in a variety of ways. The most widely thought of are emoticons that portray a facial expression, today emoticons are programed into provide a small graphic in the instant messaging application of Facebook. These simple images allow for senders to convey a simple facial expression that paired with photos of themselves can allow for the receiver to form a reasonable image of the sender and to enhance some sort of cues. Additionally the use of language acronyms an example being “LOL” for laughing out loud can also portray cues in the conversation in some form; and while these cues are not as pronounced as face to face communications they do serve some purpose in creating a meaningful communication. However “Caution, however, must be exercised with paralinguistic cues in CMC, for they have localized meanings” (Olaniran, Rodriguez, & Williams 2012) What Olaniran means by this is the cues such as emoticons and acronyms do not have the same meaning to every person who uses CMC specifically Facebook. So while the use of those types of cues can be helpful, they can also be harmful and can distort the message.

        So looking at how Facebook relates to social information processing theory, the use of nontraditional cues such as emoticons, the use of profiles to reduce uncertainty, and the ability to transfer messages instantaneously all link Facebook with social information processing theory, and seek to make easier the building of relationships using computer mediated communication.

Olaniran, B. A., Rodriguez, N., & Williams, I. M. Social Information Processing Theory (SIPT): A Cultural Perspective for International Online Communication Environments. 45-65

Walther, J. B., & Anderson, J. F. (1994). Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction. Communication Research, 21(4), 460-48.

Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American psychologist, 39(10), 1123.
Fulk, J., Steinfield, C. W., Schmitz, J., & Power, J. G. (1987). A social information processing model of media use in organizations. Communication Research, 14(5), 529-552.